Joseph Conrad |
Heart of Darkness (1902) is probably the most widely-read of Conrad's works in that it is pretty much required reading in American high schools and colleges. The movie Apocalypse Now (1979) was also loosely based on this novella, thus insuring its longevity. However, Conrad considered Nostromo (1904) to be his masterpiece. The author, a notorious complainer, often wrote while working on the serialized release of the book that this work would lead to his death by exhaustion. As a reader, I too was nearly brought to death by the lack of action within the novel.
Nostromo |
What I did find quite interesting, and somewhat contemporary in the novel is the continued debate about the importance of business in civil society. Conrad proposes through his characters that without commerce, there can be no civilization. That a successful business venture results in roads, railroads, harbors, hospitals, churches, and commerce that would not otherwise exist. Without these arteries of commerce, European style society could not flourish. 100 years later, this idea seems to still be hotly debated. The flip side to this argument is that prosperity also fuels the less noble tendencies of man leading to war, suffering, and needless death and destruction.
The Secret Agent |
While the author's intent in Nostromo is literary, The Secret Agent is blatant satire. Its characters are caricatures of notable anarchists of the period. The characters personify all the stereotypes of the shiftless anarchist - they are over-weight, under-educated, frequently jailed, or making their livings off of wealthy women or by selling French pornography. Based on the phrenological sentiments of the day, their craniums are all described as lumpy due to the criminal quality of their thoughts and their skin is sallow and oily. Apparently bad intentions make for bad health and unsightly appearance. Let this be a lesson!
As with all good satire, such as The Daily Show, one must be informed on the issue being discussed to understand the humor - hence the prodigious number of footnotes included in this edition. An early 20th century Londoner would no doubt understand the satiric intent of this novel and get the joke, but the ironic skewering of figures who have been largely lost in the sweep of history, tends to lose its humor when read by a contemporary audience.
Recommendation: Of these two novels, it is difficult to choose one over the other as I am unenthusiastic about both. I suffered great frustration in the first and found the second somewhat difficult to read - a bit like being the new guy in a group of friends who communicate using only inside jokes.
No comments:
Post a Comment