Friday, January 6, 2012

Thoughts from the Octagon

Ow, ow, ow, ow

Today was my fourth day back in the gym and I have been sticking to my 2012 resolution of hitting the gym in the morning before work. I have also been taking a few aerobic classes at night to get myself back into shape following the holidays. Tonight I took a body combat class followed by a core strengthening class.


A few thoughts occurred to me over the hour:
  • I punch like a girl. A real girlie-girl - not like the highly trained, tough women in this class who have wicked upper cuts and lightning fast jabs.
  • I kick as if I am in a chorus line, but not as gracefully.
  • The abdominal muscle I grew over the holidays is big, but not very strong.
  • I feel as if I were beat and kicked to within an inch of my life by Elena - our muscular, Russian, female instructor.
  • There is already pain - so there must be some gain.
  • Five more weeks to get this body back in shape. There is no place to hide flab in a bathing suit on board a cruise ship. And, my people are very judgmental - you know who you are....

Ow, ow, ow, ow....

From the Lists: #48 & 49: A Little DH Lawrence Anyone?

1st Edition
I continue my effort to make it through the list of 100 Best English-Language Novels of the 20th Century and D. H. Lawrence comes in at both #48 and #49. Oddly, other entries on the list that include multiple books in a series are presented as a single entry (#70 The Alexandria Quartet, #23 The USA Trilogy, #57 Parade's End). In this case, The Rainbow and Women in Love are listed separately. Perhaps the reason for this is Lawrence's radically different approach to describing the various forms of love in each.

Many of Lawrence's novels are devoted to the exploration of love outside the bounds of popular romantic Victorian novels. As such, The Rainbow (1915) was initially banned and printed copies were burned in the UK due to the frank discussion of sexual fulfillment and its importance (primacy) in relationships. The three generations of Brangwens introduced in this work, do not find themselves in particularly happy or romantic love matches. Instead, their relationships are based mainly on grudging respect, desire, and physical satisfaction. Mind you, there is no cheating, adultery, or other shenanigans presented in the text, but the idea of relationships based purely on physical needs was evidently insulting to the prim British reading public of the time. By today's standards, this work is extremely tame; however, the suggestive use of "verdant, fecund, turgid, pulsating, and burning" language when describing the mundane lives of these characters can be quite entertaining.

Women in Love (1921) picks up with the two oldest Brangwen daughters, Ursula and Gudrun, and their love interests, Rupert and Gerald. The girls fall in love at first sight with the two male characters. The men, on the other hand, are oblivious and seem to be just a bit (a lot, really) in love with each other. Some critics have suggested that this novel was intended to be Lawrence's "gay" novel, but due to the public outcry following the release of The Rainbow (i.e. bonfires), he dialed back the relationship between the two men. Where the previous novel explored physical love, this novel focuses on the various ideals of love each character strives to fulfill:
  • Ursula wants to be cherished as the center of her husband's attention
  • Gudrun is an artist who thinks she wants a powerful domineering lover only to discover that she feels smothered in his presence
  • Rupert is looking for a separate but equal love, similar to the love he feels for his best friend Gerald (see sexy, naked wrestling scene - WOOF)
  • Gerald enjoys the attentions of everyone, but feels pressure to settle down with a woman in order to fulfill his role as the eldest son of local gentry. 
Obviously, the story's tension arises from the mismatched couples - a little girlfriend swapping or a simple threesome would solve all their problems. Actually, Rupert does suggest the threesome option to Gerald - who ultimately refuses. In my opinion, the subject matter of this novel is much racier than that of the previous work. It is possible that the British public lost some of its Victorian innocence following the hardships of WWI and was more open to exploring love in all its myriad forms.

Recommendation: It is not necessary to read both books as each stands on its own merits. They are both relatively easy reads, but there is quite a bit of internal dialog and soul searching as each character navigates through their desires, emotions, hopes, and personal inventories in search of companionship and happiness. The Rainbow does not appear to have much of a defined story arc other than an extended family history of turbulent lusty relationships. Women in Love is more traditionally limited in its plot, but quite modern in its treatment of the subject matter. If you only have time for one - I suggest Women in Love.

PS - Women in Love is coming up soon in my Netflix queue. It received a slew of awards in 1968. I am really interested in seeing how the director presents the subject matter. With that said, I think that there were many more movies with challenging subjects produced in the late 1960s and early 1970s before the advent of super-quick film cuts and inexpensive special effects (for example The Graduate, The Godfather, Last Tango in Paris, Lolita, Midnight Cowboy, The French Connection, Chinatown, etc.).

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Holiday Hangover

2012 Hangover Recovery Kit - New Year's Eve Party Gift
Tuesday was my first day back to work following the holidays. In order to get an early start on my 2012 resolutions, I was up at 6:00 AM and at the gym by 6:30 for my first workout of the new year. It was cold and dark, but unlike the after work hours, the gym was pretty sparsely populated - just the early morning usual suspects. I was home by 8:00 and in the office all shiny and clean by 9:00 and I was in a great mood.



The day started with the normal holiday stories and recap. As I looked back at all of my holiday events, I realized that my goal of constructive boredom was not actually realized:
  • Dec 24 - Christmas celebration with extended family
  • Dec 25 - Christmas celebration with friends (thanks Janice and Greg for hosting), night with the pub bitches - everyone was there!
  • Dec 26 - Christmas celebration with immediate family (hosted by my sister - well done!)
  • Dec 27 - My Dinner Party
  • Dec 28 - Recovery from Dinner Party and retail therapy
  • Dec 29 - Laser hair removal, lunch with my sister and nieces at the mall, shopping with my nieces at another mall.
  • Dec 30 - Shopping for my birthday followed by birthday celebration with friends at the pub
  • Dec 31 - Dinner with Clodagh and Jerry followed by a few drinks - then Niki and Steve's Awesome New Years Eve Party
  • Jan 1 - Sleep late, meet Rafe and Patricia for New Year's Day lunch at Beasley's (awesome food and I got to meet celebrity chef Ashley Christensen!) De-Christmas the condo, clean condo
  • Jan 2 - Take decorations to Dad's for storage followed by long lunch with Dad in far away Spring Hope, reseal shower, finish laundry, tidy up for beginning of work week.
  • Jan 3 - Back to work

After a bit of thought, I may have to reconsider what retirement could be like. First, I will need to arrange for my new, portable liver to be constructed because this party schedule brought tears to the liver I was born with.  Secondly, I did not accomplish nearly as much as I intended, so a strict schedule will be required. Thirdly, I am going to need a lot more money.

On the bright side, my party muscles have been properly stretched and exercised, so there was no need for the 2012 hangover survival kit so generously provided by Niki and Steve. Now I just need to stay focused on the other muscles to prepare for my next big adventure - a Caribbean cruise scheduled for February with my best buddies - John and Jay.

Happy 2012 to you all!